Scott D. Pomfret

Publications


Impact of Dodd-Frank on the Division of Investment Management’s “Regulation Lite” Regime, A Closer Look (newsletter) (forthcoming Summer 2011).

Avoiding the Headlines: How Financial Services Firms Can Implement Programs to Prevent Insider Trading, PwC Financial Services Institute (June 2011) (co-authored).

Regulatory Impact of Dodd-Frank, Asia Pacific Private Equity Tax newsletter (April 2011).

Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill: Reporting by Private Fund Advisers on Form PF, A Closer Look (newsletter) (March 2011).

Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill: Impact on Asset Managers, A Closer Look (newsletter) (December 2010).

Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill: Effect on Advisers to Real Estate Private Funds, A Closer Look (newsletter) (November 2010).

“Surviving an SEC Inspection” and “Creating and Maintaining Books and Records,” in U.S. Private Equity Compliance Guide (Private Equity Institute Media, October 2010) (co-authored).

SEC’S New Pay-to-Play Rule, PwC News Brief (October 2010) (co-authored).

Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill: Effect on SEC’s Enforcement Division and Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, A Closer Look (newsletter) (August 2010).

Regulatory Update, Audit Committee Current Developments (newsletter) (Spring 2010, Summer 2010, Fall 2010, Winter 2011).

The Role of the Courts in Shaping Health Policy: An Empirical Analysis, 29 J. L. Med. & Ethics 278 (Fall/Winter 2001) (co-authored).

ERISA and Physician Autonomy, 283 Journal of the American Medical Association 921 (February, 2000) (co-authored).

Establishing New Legal Doctrine in Managed Care: a Model of Judicial Response to Industrial Change, 32 Mich. J. L. Reform  813 (Summer, 1999) (co-authored).

ERISA’s “Other” Preemption Problem: Successful Pleading Shifts the Battleground on MCO Negligence Suits to State Court, 22 Trial Lawyer 219 (1999). 

Form, Function, and Managed Care Torts:  Achieving Fairness And Equity In ERISA Jurisprudence, 35 Hous. L. Rev. 985 (1998) (co-authored). [1]

Book Notice, 96 Mich. L. Rev. 1606 (1998) (review of John Garvey, What Are Freedoms For? (1997)).

Note, A Tempered “Yes” to the “Exculpatory No”, 96 Mich. L. Rev. 754 (1997).



[1] Cited by the United States Supreme Court in Pegram v. Hedrich, No. 98-1949, 2000 WL 743301 (June 12, 2000), and by the high court of New York in Nealy v. U.S. Healthcare, 711 N.E.2d 621 (N.Y. 1999).